[Bug target/36134] GCC creates suboptimal ASM : usage of ADDA.L where LEA could be used

2008-11-14 Thread ams at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from ams at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-14 10:50 --- Subject: Bug 36134 Author: ams Date: Fri Nov 14 10:49:06 2008 New Revision: 141853 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=141853 Log: 2008-11-14 Maxim Kuvyrkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrew

[Bug target/36134] GCC creates suboptimal ASM : usage of ADDA.L where LEA could be used

2008-11-14 Thread ams at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from ams at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-14 10:53 --- The patch posted here has been accepted and committed: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg00581.html This should resolve this issue. Andrew -- ams at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What

[Bug target/36134] GCC creates suboptimal ASM : usage of ADDA.L where LEA could be used

2008-06-12 Thread gunnar at greyhound-data dot com
--- Comment #6 from gunnar at greyhound-data dot com 2008-06-12 14:27 --- Andreas, could you please have a look at this? Cheers Gunnar -- gunnar at greyhound-data dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/36134] GCC creates suboptimal ASM : usage of ADDA.L where LEA could be used

2008-06-10 Thread gunnar at greyhound-data dot com
--- Comment #5 from gunnar at greyhound-data dot com 2008-06-10 15:24 --- (In reply to comment #4) Could you please submit your patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED], including a ChangeLog entry and stating how you tested it. As requested I did send the email last week. Do you need anything

[Bug target/36134] GCC creates suboptimal ASM : usage of ADDA.L where LEA could be used

2008-06-02 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Comment #4 from schwab at suse dot de 2008-06-02 22:37 --- Could you please submit your patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED], including a ChangeLog entry and stating how you tested it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36134

[Bug target/36134] GCC creates suboptimal ASM : usage of ADDA.L where LEA could be used

2008-05-29 Thread gunnar at greyhound-data dot com
--- Comment #3 from gunnar at greyhound-data dot com 2008-05-29 12:50 --- Created an attachment (id=15699) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15699action=view) Prefer 4 byte long LEA over 6 byte long ADD.L Please include the attached patch for GCC. The added patch has

[Bug target/36134] GCC creates suboptimal ASM : usage of ADDA.L where LEA could be used

2008-05-28 Thread gunnar at greyhound-data dot com
--- Comment #2 from gunnar at greyhound-data dot com 2008-05-28 16:18 --- (In reply to comment #1) It would have been nice to check at least gcc 4.3 (or better current trunk). I've verified with latest source gcc source version 4.4.0 20080523 (experimental) (GCC) The most current

[Bug target/36134] GCC creates suboptimal ASM : usage of ADDA.L where LEA could be used

2008-05-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-07 19:33 --- It would have been nice to check at least gcc 4.3 (or better current trunk). -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added