[Bug target/36466] internal compiler error: in choose_reload_regs, at reload1.c:6190

2013-08-05 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36466 Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/36466] internal compiler error: in choose_reload_regs, at reload1.c:6190

2010-08-16 Thread lool at dooz dot org
--- Comment #8 from lool at dooz dot org 2010-08-16 14:21 --- I'm not sure how the .i ends up with a zero-length array; resolv.h has: # define MAXNS 3 /* max # name servers we'll track */ [...] struct __res_state { [...] struct sockaddr_in

[Bug target/36466] internal compiler error: in choose_reload_regs, at reload1.c:6190

2010-08-16 Thread lool at dooz dot org
--- Comment #9 from lool at dooz dot org 2010-08-16 14:22 --- Also, even if it's invalid input, I guess gcc should never SEGV, but rather throw an error out? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36466

[Bug target/36466] internal compiler error: in choose_reload_regs, at reload1.c:6190

2010-08-16 Thread tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-16 14:34 --- Reopening since GCC should not ICE, even if the code is invalid. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/36466] internal compiler error: in choose_reload_regs, at reload1.c:6190

2010-08-16 Thread tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-16 14:35 --- Reopening. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug target/36466] internal compiler error: in choose_reload_regs, at reload1.c:6190

2010-08-16 Thread lool at dooz dot org
--- Comment #12 from lool at dooz dot org 2010-08-16 14:40 --- Ok, it's [0] because ziproxy uses nsaddr as an identifier for a local variable which conflicts with a compatibility #define in glibc resolv.h. Renaming to nsaddress for instance fixes the build, so clearly bogus source

[Bug target/36466] internal compiler error: in choose_reload_regs, at reload1.c:6190

2009-08-05 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-05 16:42 --- Invalid testcase as per comment #6. (In reply to comment #4) I see the same problem when I try to compile transmission release 1.73. The error happens with file libtransmission/fdlimit.c. Works till -O1 but fails

[Bug target/36466] internal compiler error: in choose_reload_regs, at reload1.c:6190

2009-08-04 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Comment #5 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-08-04 13:58 --- Confirmed with gcc-4.3-20090802, gcc-4.4-20090728, and gcc-4.5-20090730. Passing -mtune=xscale to gcc prevents the ICE. -- mikpe at it dot uu dot se changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/36466] internal compiler error: in choose_reload_regs, at reload1.c:6190

2009-08-04 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Comment #6 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-08-04 14:07 --- Hang on, the test case looks invalid: ReadCfgFile (char *cfg_file) { void *conf_handler; int i; struct sockaddr_in nsaddr_list[0]; char *nserver_str; qp_getconf_array_str (conf_handler, Nameservers, i,

[Bug target/36466] internal compiler error: in choose_reload_regs, at reload1.c:6190

2009-01-02 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #2 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-01-02 11:50 --- Confirmed with gcc-4.3.2-1 Debian gnueabi: $ gcc -c -O1 pr36466.c pr36466.c: In function ‘ReadCfgFile’: pr36466.c:19: internal compiler error: in choose_reload_regs, at reload1.c:6190 And on trunk rev 142984: pr36466.c:

[Bug target/36466] internal compiler error: in choose_reload_regs, at reload1.c:6190

2009-01-02 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #3 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-01-02 11:53 --- backtrace on trunk: (gdb) bt #0 fancy_abort (file=0x786084 ../../trunk/gcc/reload1.c, line=6470, function=0x785f8c choose_reload_regs) at ../../trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c:712 #1 0x002ba378 in choose_reload_regs

[Bug target/36466] internal compiler error: in choose_reload_regs, at reload1.c:6190

2008-06-08 Thread aurelien at aurel32 dot net
--- Comment #1 from aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2008-06-08 14:31 --- Created an attachment (id=15731) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15731action=view) reduced testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36466