[Bug target/36635] [4.4 Regression] cc1 segfault from svn 137122

2008-10-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-08 08:13 --- Subject: Bug 36635 Author: jakub Date: Wed Oct 8 08:12:25 2008 New Revision: 140966 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140966 Log: PR target/36635 PR target/37290 PR

[Bug target/36635] [4.4 Regression] cc1 segfault from svn 137122

2008-10-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-08 08:16 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/36635] [4.4 Regression] cc1 segfault from svn 137122

2008-10-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-07 14:57 --- This one isn't reproducible for me on the trunk. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36635

[Bug target/36635] [4.4 Regression] cc1 segfault from svn 137122

2008-10-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-07 16:16 --- I've reproduced PR37341 though. And I believe your patch is an overkill, as cse_cc_succs only recurses if edge destination has a single predecessor. So IMHO you don't need to keep a bitmap of visited blocks, as the

[Bug target/36635] [4.4 Regression] cc1 segfault from svn 137122

2008-07-05 Thread cltang at pllab dot cs dot nthu dot edu dot tw
--- Comment #2 from cltang at pllab dot cs dot nthu dot edu dot tw 2008-07-05 07:57 --- Created an attachment (id=15859) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15859action=view) Patch for cse.c I have looked at the debug dumps for the testcase. This seems like a very rare