subject:"\[Bug target\/37633\] \[4.4 Regression\] wrong register use on sh64"

[Bug target/37633] [4.4 Regression] wrong register use on sh64

2009-03-08 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Comment #10 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-08 16:35 --- (In reply to comment #3) I've checked the old RA. It does not assigned partially clobbered hard register because it is done only when non partially clobbered hard regs were tried first. Sh has a lot of such

[Bug target/37633] [4.4 Regression] wrong register use on sh64

2009-01-02 Thread andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de

--- Comment #8 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2009-01-02 17:08 --- What is the status of this bug? -- andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/37633] [4.4 Regression] wrong register use on sh64

2009-01-02 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Comment #9 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-02 22:51 --- The failure itself went away but requested to stay open. See the thread http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-10/msg00606.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37633

[Bug target/37633] [4.4 Regression] wrong register use on sh64

2008-10-21 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Comment #7 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-21 23:42 --- Subject: Bug 37633 Author: kkojima Date: Tue Oct 21 23:40:41 2008 New Revision: 141282 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=141282 Log: PR target/37633 * config/sh/sh.c

[Bug target/37633] [4.4 Regression] wrong register use on sh64

2008-10-15 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Comment #5 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-15 23:14 --- Thanks for taking a look at this problem. Your patch mentioned in #3 fixes the test case in #1 on sh64. Even with it, there are similar failures with -O0 in the result of the gcc testsuite on sh64-linux. --

[Bug target/37633] [4.4 Regression] wrong register use on sh64

2008-10-15 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Comment #6 from vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-16 00:54 --- Subject: Bug 37633 Author: vmakarov Date: Thu Oct 16 00:52:59 2008 New Revision: 141161 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=141161 Log: 2008-10-14 Vladimir Makarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug target/37633] [4.4 Regression] wrong register use on sh64

2008-10-14 Thread vmakarov at redhat dot com

--- Comment #3 from vmakarov at redhat dot com 2008-10-14 19:42 --- I've checked the old RA. It does not assigned partially clobbered hard register because it is done only when non partially clobbered hard regs were tried first. Sh has a lot of such registers therefore the chance to

[Bug target/37633] [4.4 Regression] wrong register use on sh64

2008-10-14 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-14 22:24 --- Subject: Bug 37633 Author: hjl Date: Tue Oct 14 22:23:23 2008 New Revision: 141120 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=141120 Log: 2008-10-14 Vladimir Makarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug target/37633] [4.4 Regression] wrong register use on sh64

2008-10-08 Thread vmakarov at redhat dot com

--- Comment #2 from vmakarov at redhat dot com 2008-10-08 21:55 --- Thanks for working on the problem. I am afraid that preventing to use partially clobbered hard regs for allocnos living through calls is wrong. In most general case I believe the problem should be fixed in

[Bug target/37633] [4.4 Regression] wrong register use on sh64

2008-09-25 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Comment #1 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 03:31 --- I've tried --- ORIG/trunk/gcc/ira-color.c Wed Sep 17 09:48:49 2008 +++ LOCAL/trunk/gcc/ira-color.c Thu Sep 25 12:09:30 2008 @@ -514,7 +514,9 @@ assign_hard_reg (ira_allocno_t allocno, #endif if (!