[Bug target/39361] [4.4 Regression] Many new neon test failures

2009-03-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-10 13:29 --- We are back to the previous set of neon fails. -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/39361] [4.4 Regression] Many new neon test failures

2009-03-08 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-08 23:10 --- There is if (optimize) test in inliner to disable copy and constant propagation. The reason is to preserve debug info, with optimizing we always do cprop while inlining. So this patch just enable constant propagatio

[Bug target/39361] [4.4 Regression] Many new neon test failures

2009-03-08 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-08 22:37 --- Subject: Bug 39361 Author: hubicka Date: Sun Mar 8 22:37:26 2009 New Revision: 144713 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=144713 Log: PR target/39361 * tree-inline.c (setup_one_p

[Bug target/39361] [4.4 Regression] Many new neon test failures

2009-03-08 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-08 14:23 --- Why special-case -O0? Is there anything in the compiler that makes it impossible to trigger this problem with the right set of options (-fno-tree-{vrp,ccp} or something like that)? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug target/39361] [4.4 Regression] Many new neon test failures

2009-03-07 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug target/39361] [4.4 Regression] Many new neon test failures

2009-03-04 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-05 02:04 --- I specifically kept the code propagating TREE_READONLY arguments so const arguments will get constant propagated at -O0. But I see the propagation is disabled for SSA registers. I am testing patch for this... I gues

[Bug target/39361] [4.4 Regression] Many new neon test failures

2009-03-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-04 15:39 --- This is likely caused by 2009-02-28 Jan Hubicka PR debug/39267 * tree-inline.c (setup_one_parameter): Do not copy propagate arguments when not optimizing. Honza, the easiest would be pro