--- Comment #6 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-10 13:29 ---
We are back to the previous set of neon fails.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #5 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-08 23:10 ---
There is if (optimize) test in inliner to disable copy and constant
propagation. The reason is to preserve debug info, with optimizing we always do
cprop while inlining.
So this patch just enable constant propagatio
--- Comment #4 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-08 22:37 ---
Subject: Bug 39361
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Mar 8 22:37:26 2009
New Revision: 144713
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=144713
Log:
PR target/39361
* tree-inline.c (setup_one_p
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-08 14:23 ---
Why special-case -O0? Is there anything in the compiler that makes it
impossible to trigger this problem with the right set of options
(-fno-tree-{vrp,ccp} or something like that)?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #2 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-05 02:04 ---
I specifically kept the code propagating TREE_READONLY arguments so const
arguments will get constant propagated at -O0. But I see the propagation is
disabled for SSA registers.
I am testing patch for this...
I gues
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-04 15:39 ---
This is likely caused by
2009-02-28 Jan Hubicka
PR debug/39267
* tree-inline.c (setup_one_parameter): Do not copy propagate
arguments when not optimizing.
Honza, the easiest would be pro