[Bug target/40105] SH: 4.3/4.4 compilers segfault when recompiling itself on gentoo system

2009-05-18 Thread armin76 at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #6 from armin76 at gentoo dot org 2009-05-18 16:29 --- Sorry for taking a while, but i'm pretty sure you know sh machines are kinda of slow :) Yes! it works! Thank you for investigating it -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40105

[Bug target/40105] SH: 4.3/4.4 compilers segfault when recompiling itself on gentoo system

2009-05-13 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-13 14:07 --- Created an attachment (id=17857) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17857action=view) a test case I've got a small test case from libiberty/concat.c. With -O1, 4.3 compiles vconcat_length to the

[Bug target/40105] SH: 4.3/4.4 compilers segfault when recompiling itself on gentoo system

2009-05-13 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 00:12 --- Created an attachment (id=17860) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17860action=view) A patch A binary search on trunk shows me that the patch in r146829 and its follow-up r146988 fix the issue. See

[Bug target/40105] SH: 4.3/4.4 compilers segfault when recompiling itself on gentoo system

2009-05-12 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-12 22:37 --- Ah, now I understand the issue and find that what we need in the bug report http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#need is in http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=267247. Next time, please give the minimal information to