[Bug target/40332] (.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.

2010-01-17 Thread gary at intrepid dot com
--- Comment #10 from gary at intrepid dot com 2010-01-17 18:56 --- (In reply to comment #9) > Since the corresponding binutils bug is fixed, should this PR be closed ? We ran into this bug recently, running tests against a GCC (4.5 precursor) snapshot. Discussion here: http://gcc.gnu.o

[Bug target/40332] (.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.

2009-06-20 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #9 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-06-20 17:56 --- Since the corresponding binutils bug is fixed, should this PR be closed ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40332

[Bug target/40332] (.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.

2009-06-09 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #8 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-06-09 10:52 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Anyway, you should probably just tar up the .a library and other things you > are > linking together and with that report it in binutils bugzilla. > filed this PR for binutiles, http://sou

[Bug target/40332] (.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.

2009-06-09 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #7 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-06-09 10:26 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Couldn't reproduce (just built cp2k on x86_64-linux with trunk gfortran and > .eh_frame_hdr has been created just fine). I'm using binutils 2.19.51.0.2. > > Anyway, you should probably just t

[Bug target/40332] (.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.

2009-06-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-09 09:36 --- Couldn't reproduce (just built cp2k on x86_64-linux with trunk gfortran and .eh_frame_hdr has been created just fine). I'm using binutils 2.19.51.0.2. Anyway, you should probably just tar up the .a library and other

[Bug target/40332] (.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.

2009-06-09 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #5 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-06-09 08:54 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Start with trying newer binutils. same error with : /data03/vondele/binutils-2.19.1/build/bin/ld: error in /data03/vondele/clean/cp2k/src/../lib/Linux-x86-64-gfortran/sdbg/libcp2k_lib.a(ep_met

[Bug target/40332] (.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.

2009-06-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-09 08:38 --- Start with trying newer binutils. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40332

[Bug target/40332] (.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.

2009-06-09 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #3 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-06-09 08:34 --- Jakub, the error message I get below is new with gcc 4.5, and is still present as of revision 148276 (20090608). Is there any info I can provide (e.g. attach the object file?) that could help in getting this resolved as

[Bug target/40332] (.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.

2009-06-03 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-06-03 17:14 --- (In reply to comment #1) > What binutils version are you using? do ld --version. This might be a bug in > binutils really. it is recent, I think: > ld -v GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE 11.0) 2.18.50.20080409-11.1 --

[Bug target/40332] (.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.

2009-06-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-03 17:09 --- What binutils version are you using? do ld --version. This might be a bug in binutils really. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40332