https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #40 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 43755
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43755=edit
gcc-7 backport patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #39 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 43753
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43753=edit
gcc-5 backport patch
There's been some interest in a backport of the patch to gcc-5 and gcc-7
branches.
Since I've
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #38 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Tue Jan 30 21:18:40 2018
New Revision: 257209
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257209=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix use of Solaris values-Xc.o (PR target/40411)
PR target/40411
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #37 from Bruno Haible ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #35)
> Fixed for GCC 8.1.
Please consider comment 17:
The behaviour of a shared library also depends on whether the executable
is linked with or without values-xpg6.o.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #34 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jan 12 09:52:53 2018
New Revision: 256568
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256568=gcc=rev
Log:
Link with correct values-*.o files on Solaris (PR target/40411)
gcc/testsuite:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #33 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
Jeff,
> Still here and following from afar; I'm not using solaris much these days, but
> it always brightens my day when I get an email re this bug and some level of
> progress is made
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #32 from Jeff Downs ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #31)
> The attached patch does this, and includes a forward port of Jeff's
> patch to escape special characters like `:' in %{S:X} expressions.
[...]
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #31 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
I've started looking at this again.
Norm's patch has a few problems:
* For one, it matches a couple of alias names for -std values, which
will never hit the specs machinery.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #30 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 40507
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40507=edit
combined proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
Norm Jacobs changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||norm.jacobs at oracle dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
Lionel Cons lionelcons1972 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #27 from Sean McGovern gseanmcg at gmail dot com 2012-06-01
14:23:21 UTC ---
I just found out how ugly this can get.
freopen(3C) has different behaviour in the case where the first argument is
NULL depending on if SUSv3 behaviour has
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #24 from Sean McGovern gseanmcg at gmail dot com 2011-11-25
16:25:02 UTC ---
Ping^2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #25 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-25 16:34:03 UTC ---
No progress yet: an attempt to handle this via specs some time ago
failed since there was some of Joseph's option work missing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #26 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2011-11-25 17:15:31 UTC ---
All the various options equivalent to -std=c99 now map to -std=c99 using
Alias in the .opt file, so specs only need to handle that one
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #23 from Sean McGovern gseanmcg at gmail dot com 2011-03-07
20:16:09 UTC ---
Ping.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #22 from Sean McGovern gseanmcg at gmail dot com 2011-01-05
19:50:09 UTC ---
Sorry, still learning -- collect2 is definitely not the place for this.
Target-specific plugin maybe?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #21 from Sean McGovern gseanmcg at gmail dot com 2011-01-04
18:11:09 UTC ---
Why not introduce a warning for 4.6 that it is linking against this object file
and that any other libraries alongside that are not tested against C99 may
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
po...@gcc.gnu.org pogma at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pogma at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
bruno at clisp dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bruno at clisp dot org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #18 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2010-12-26
18:35:49 UTC ---
Rainer, can you have another look to this issue and possibly actually close it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-26
21:52:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
For this reason, I would find it bad if gcc -std=c99 or gcc -std=gnu99
would cause values-xpg6.o to be included in the link.
--- Comment #16 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-20 17:53 ---
Mine.
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc
--- Comment #14 from heydowns at borg dot com 2009-10-09 19:38 ---
Ping - anyone able to comment on or integrate this patch please?
Thank you!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-09 19:42
---
Patches should be sent to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org with a changelog entry and
a note on how you tested the patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #13 from heydowns at borg dot com 2009-07-16 21:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=18210)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18210action=view)
Fix updated for gcc 4.4.0, link xpg6 for c++, and link xpg4 for gnu*
Updated patch against gcc 4.4.0.
Also add xpg6
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-04 07:57
---
Attaching a fix that works here for Solaris 10 and I think would work for
other Solaris versions.
Thanks.
It changes the spec to account for the other options mentioned in comment 3,
to handle the main
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-07-04 11:49 ---
Subject: Re: -std=c99 does not enable c99 mode in Solaris
C library
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
I wasn't sure exactly how to handle the various -std=gnu* modes, so I left
--- Comment #11 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-04 16:46
---
As far as I could tell from the documentation available to me, values-xpg4
didn't exist until Solaris 2.6. Based on the file names I was thinking
sol2-6.h was for 2.6 and above, where sol2.h had to work for
--- Comment #7 from heydowns at borg dot com 2009-07-02 14:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=18121)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18121action=view)
Proposed fix: Changes linking on solaris based on std=X and implements escapes
in braced specs
Attaching a fix that
--- Comment #5 from heydowns at borg dot com 2009-06-18 21:26 ---
Was looking at modifying the spec to produce the desired results and contribute
patch, however ran into trouble trying to match options containing literal
colons (-std=iso9899:199409) in %{S:X} style spec.
Is there a way
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-18 21:49 ---
Subject: Re: -std=c99 does not enable c99 mode in Solaris
C library
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, heydowns at borg dot com wrote:
Was looking at modifying the spec to produce the desired results and
contribute
patch,
--- Comment #1 from heydowns at borg dot com 2009-06-17 15:13 ---
This also applies to Solaris x86.
Additionally, this only applies to Solaris 10 and later. Earlier versions of
Solaris did not ship c99-compliant C library and thus do not have the
values-xpg6.o object file for enabling
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-17 15:24 ---
GCC 3.4.x is no longer maintained, please check GCC 4.3.x or newer.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
37 matches
Mail list logo
