--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 11:20
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released. Deferring to 4.5.1.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from jon_y at users dot sourceforge dot net 2010-03-28
10:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=20228)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20228action=view)
Broken stdlib.h
Hi,
This patched caused problems for mingw-w64 stdlib.h, see attachment.
--
--- Comment #11 from jon_y at users dot sourceforge dot net 2010-03-28
10:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=20229)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20229action=view)
log from buildbot
Here is the error output from one of the buildbot slaves.
--
--- Comment #12 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-28 14:44
---
(In reply to comment #10)
Created an attachment (id=20228)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20228action=view) [edit]
Broken stdlib.h
Hi,
This patched caused problems for mingw-w64
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-28 15:34
---
(In reply to comment #12)
(In reply to comment #10)
Created an attachment (id=20228)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20228action=view) [edit]
Broken stdlib.h
Hi,
This patched
--- Comment #14 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-28 16:41 ---
Subject: Bug 40722
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Mar 28 16:40:50 2010
New Revision: 157784
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=157784
Log:
2010-03-28 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
PR target/40722
--- Comment #8 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-23 12:32 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
An updated patch is at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg00937.html
Patch is fine. It is absolutely necessary to support gcc's intrinsic headers
for mingw. The fixinclude
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-23 13:24 ---
Subject: Bug 40722
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Mar 23 13:24:37 2010
New Revision: 157665
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=157665
Log:
Fix stdlib.h for mingw.
2010-03-23 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-20 14:34 ---
I saw
_CRTIMP unsigned int __cdecl __MINGW_NOTHROW _rotl(unsigned int, int)
__MINGW_ATTRIB_CONST;
_CRTIMP unsigned int __cdecl __MINGW_NOTHROW _rotr(unsigned int, int)
__MINGW_ATTRIB_CONST;
_CRTIMP unsigned long
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-20 18:01 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg00936.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40722
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-20 18:09 ---
An updated patch is at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg00937.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40722
--- Comment #4 from nightstrike at gmail dot com 2010-03-19 16:16 ---
Can we fix this before 4.5 is released?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40722
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40722
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-12 08:24 ---
These were added by HJ. Either we need to fixinclude stdlib.h or not define
these based on a configure test (I guess the former is more robust if
ia32intrin.h defines these only if they are not already defined).
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-07-12 18:19 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
These were added by HJ. Either we need to fixinclude stdlib.h or not define
these based on a configure test (I guess the former is more robust if
ia32intrin.h defines these only if they
15 matches
Mail list logo
