--- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-25 16:40 ---
Subject: Bug 42427
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Mar 25 16:39:51 2010
New Revision: 157726
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157726
Log:
Backport regression testcases from mainline.
2010-03-25 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #10 from bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-18 03:14
---
Fixed.
--
bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #9 from bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-18 03:10 ---
Subject: Bug 42427
Author: bergner
Date: Thu Mar 18 03:10:04 2010
New Revision: 157530
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157530
Log:
gcc/
PR target/42427
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-10 16:19 ---
Downgrading to P2. Target maintainers think this is not a serious bug and are
happy with not fixing it for 4.5.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-19 16:28 ---
Sorry, David and I talked offline about the last patch and he still has some
reservations about the code (even the pre-patched code). After discussing
this, I'm going to try adding a splitter which should hopefully
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-19 14:33 ---
Ping?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42427
--- Comment #5 from bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-14 21:12 ---
This ended up being a latent bug exposed by Bernd's patch. I posted a fix
here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00678.html
--
bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Remove
--- Comment #4 from bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 23:05 ---
Ahh, yes, you are correct. I can confirm the bogus assembly code. I'll
investigate.
--
bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 22:12 ---
I get the same error with mainline built today. I'm using a compiler that
defaults to -m32; it works fine with -m64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42427
--- Comment #2 from bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 21:57 ---
The assembly looks different and doesn't error with today's trunk (revision
155629). I'll try with the revision Janis pointed out and see if it really is
fixed or is just latent again.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-02 16:05 ---
Huh, but this looks like a target problem if we generate invalid assembly.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|invalid assembly code for |[4.5 Regression] invalid
|301.apsi for -fnon-call-
12 matches
Mail list logo
