--- Comment #6 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 19:35
---
Subject: Bug 42495
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Tue Jul 27 19:34:55 2010
New Revision: 162590
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162590
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/40956
PR target/42495
--- Comment #7 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 19:38
---
Subject: Bug 42495
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Tue Jul 27 19:38:10 2010
New Revision: 162592
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162592
Log:
PR target/42495
PR middle-end/42574
--- Comment #8 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 19:42
---
Subject: Bug 42495
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Tue Jul 27 19:42:15 2010
New Revision: 162594
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162594
Log:
PR target/42495
PR middle-end/42574
--- Comment #9 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 19:45
---
Subject: Bug 42495
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Tue Jul 27 19:44:51 2010
New Revision: 162595
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162595
Log:
PR target/42495
PR middle-end/42574
--- Comment #10 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 19:48
---
Subject: Bug 42495
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Tue Jul 27 19:48:15 2010
New Revision: 162597
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162597
Log:
PR target/42495
PR middle-end/42574
--- Comment #11 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 21:06
---
Subject: Bug 42495
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Tue Jul 27 21:06:31 2010
New Revision: 162600
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162600
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/40956
PR
--- Comment #12 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 21:11
---
Should be fixed now by the above patch series.
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-08 10:41
---
Elimination of subsequent calculations of PIC addresses should be handled in
code hoisting optimization.
However, there are two problems that inhibit the optimization:
1. ARM backend outputs calculation of a
--- Comment #4 from carrot at google dot com 2010-03-21 09:18 ---
It is for thumb1, there should be another parameter that I missed
-march=armv5te. It still exists in today's trunk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42495
--- Comment #3 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-19 15:12 ---
Is this for Thumb1 or Thumb2 ? Can you check with trunk today ?
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
--- Comment #1 from carrot at google dot com 2009-12-25 07:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=19388)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19388action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42495
--- Comment #2 from carrot at google dot com 2009-12-25 07:52 ---
instruction. It uses the same number of instructions. -Os should do the same
It uses the same number of registers.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42495
13 matches
Mail list logo
