[Bug target/43088] [avr] Suspect optimizer missed code in gcc 4.4.3..

2011-07-02 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43088 --- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-02 21:07:50 UTC --- Created attachment 24659 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24659 C source file Compile with -mmcu=atmega168 -Os. This file shows the flaw

[Bug target/43088] [avr] Suspect optimizer missed code in gcc 4.4.3..

2011-06-10 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43088 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug target/43088] [avr] Suspect optimizer missed code in gcc 4.4.3..

2010-09-20 Thread eric dot weddington at atmel dot com
--- Comment #4 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2010-09-20 12:58 --- (In reply to comment #3) It exits for the reported version (4.4.3) and as well as for trunk/4.6. Abnikant, could you also post the patch that fixes this problem? Thanks. -- eric dot weddington at

[Bug target/43088] [avr] Suspect optimizer missed code in gcc 4.4.3..

2010-09-19 Thread eric dot weddington at atmel dot com
--- Comment #2 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2010-09-20 02:30 --- (In reply to comment #1) This bug is confirmed. andhi3/andsi3 causing this problem. conditional checks in andhi3 and andsi3 need to compare with zero instead of 0xff [etc]. i.e. in andhi3 we need to

[Bug target/43088] [avr] Suspect optimizer missed code in gcc 4.4.3..

2010-09-19 Thread abnikant dot singh at atmel dot com
--- Comment #3 from abnikant dot singh at atmel dot com 2010-09-20 04:24 --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) This bug is confirmed. andhi3/andsi3 causing this problem. conditional checks in andhi3 and andsi3 need to compare with zero instead of 0xff [etc].

[Bug target/43088] [avr] Suspect optimizer missed code in gcc 4.4.3..

2010-09-12 Thread abnikant dot singh at atmel dot com
--- Comment #1 from abnikant dot singh at atmel dot com 2010-09-13 05:58 --- This bug is confirmed. andhi3/andsi3 causing this problem. conditional checks in andhi3 and andsi3 need to compare with zero instead of 0xff [etc]. i.e. in andhi3 we need to replace (mask 0x00ff) != 0xff by