subject:"\[Bug target\/43613\] Some architecture\-dependent codes"

[Bug target/43613] Some architecture-dependent codes

2010-03-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-01 01:15 --- >gcc/src/gcc/ira-conflicts.c: Line 125: That is printing out a long correctly (has no pointers in it, though it does have a sizeof). >gcc/src/gcc/tree-dump.c: Line 168: /gcc/src/gcc/cp/class.c: Line 6740, 6742, 6764

[Bug target/43613] Some architecture-dependent codes

2010-04-01 Thread aflyhorse at foxmail dot com

--- Comment #2 from aflyhorse at foxmail dot com 2010-04-01 08:23 --- Got your ideas and be sorry for i chobber the building tree of my computer and the tree of package, there shouldn't be /gcc/src in the path (I was confused when i'm looking for the file myself) that time i'm testing t

[Bug target/43613] Some architecture-dependent codes

2010-04-01 Thread aflyhorse at foxmail dot com

--- Comment #3 from aflyhorse at foxmail dot com 2010-04-01 08:26 --- Also, the compiler do stopped and treat warnings as errors while compiling ira-conflicts.c until i changed these 2 "%ld" to "%I64u" -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43613

[Bug target/43613] Some architecture-dependent codes

2010-04-12 Thread aflyhorse at foxmail dot com

--- Comment #4 from aflyhorse at foxmail dot com 2010-04-12 10:44 --- Maybe I should still choose the proprietary compiler of M$ for my Win_x64-target platform... -- aflyhorse at foxmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/43613] Some architecture-dependent codes

2010-04-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-12 14:12 --- I don't get why you closed this bug. Anyways if you have a patch, post it to gcc-patc...@. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/43613] Some architecture-dependent codes

2010-04-13 Thread aflyhorse at foxmail dot com

--- Comment #6 from aflyhorse at foxmail dot com 2010-04-13 10:58 --- (In reply to comment #5) > I don't get why you closed this bug. Anyways if you have a patch, post it to > gcc-patc...@. Sorry, I see nobody concerns this, and I'm more anxious about how to port the libgcj (especially

[Bug target/43613] Some architecture-dependent codes

2021-09-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43613 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/43613] Some architecture-dependent codes

2024-02-17 Thread nightstrike at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43613 --- Comment #10 from nightstrike --- Patch thread started here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-February/644674.html https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/4700e066-1b50-4e7b-92f7-d8c33a330...@gmail.com/ and ended with this sol