https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
--- Comment #9 from Marat Zakirov ---
I used following patch
diff --git a/gcc/cse.c b/gcc/cse.c
index 34f9364..a9e0442 100644
--- a/gcc/cse.c
+++ b/gcc/cse.c
@@ -2862,6 +2862,9 @@ canon_reg (rtx x, rtx insn)
|| ! REGNO_QTY_VALID_P (R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
--- Comment #8 from Marat Zakirov ---
UPDATE
Using little fix you may got a much better code...
transpose_16x16:
.fnstart
@ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
@ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0
@ link regi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
Marat Zakirov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joseph at codesourcery dot com,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
--- Comment #6 from Siarhei Siamashka
2011-06-29 13:35:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 24630
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24630
test.c
Attached a slightly updated testcase, which can demonstrate unnecessary spills
to stack e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
--- Comment #5 from Siarhei Siamashka
2010-10-08 14:13:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, siarhei.siamashka at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
> >
> > --- Comment #2 from Siarh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2010-10-05
07:16:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > So the compiler is correct not to be using vld1 for this code. The memory
> > format of int32x4_t is defined to be the f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-10-04 23:45:57 UTC ---
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, siarhei.siamashka at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
>
> --- Comment #2 from Siarhei Siamashka
> 2010-1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
--- Comment #2 from Siarhei Siamashka
2010-10-04 22:59:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> So the compiler is correct not to be using vld1 for this code. The memory
> format of int32x4_t is defined to be the format of a neon register that has
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-05-11 07:35:23 |2010-09-29 7:35:23
date|
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywo
13 matches
Mail list logo
