https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44002
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-03-31
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44002
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jay from comment #4)
> Incorrect bug.
Correct place was bug 84628 comment #6, for any confused onlookers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44002
--- Comment #4 from Jay ---
Incorrect bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44002
--- Comment #3 from Jay ---
But, the thing is, because optimization can remove the use of such functions,
people are now advocating that we noinline along with the attribute, which
hypothetically is unwarranted damage. Noinline being a partial
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44002
--- Comment #2 from jayk123 at hotmail dot com ---
The ifndef pid_t makes it a little unconvincing. I'll see if I can find my
alpha-dec-vms sysroot -- and resume trying to get this target working -- I had
gotten as far as building the canadian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44002
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
