http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46692
--- Comment #5 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
18:15:08 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 18:15:02 2011
New Revision: 169743
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169743
Log:
PR gcc/46692
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46692
--- Comment #3 from Sebastien Bourdeauducq lekernel at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-01 11:52:15 UTC ---
Author: lekernel
Date: Tue Feb 1 11:52:12 2011
New Revision: 169473
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169473
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46692
Sebastien Bourdeauducq sebastien.bourdeauducq at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46692
--- Comment #2 from Sebastien Bourdeauducq sebastien.bourdeauducq at gmail dot
com 2010-11-30 23:29:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I'm sorry, but are you really trying to argue that libraries like libc and libm
MUST ALWAYS use the software
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46692
Ralf Corsepius corsepiu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||corsepiu at
