http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #22 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-02-22 10:44:47 UTC ---
At revision 170376 (comment #21), the fix of revision 170339 (comment #6)
seems no longer needed on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #23 from Mike Stump mikestump at comcast dot net 2011-02-22
11:53:56 UTC ---
I am confused, both Iain and myself still see failures on ppc even with my
patch. Iain said they were dying on BUILT_IN_SQRTL. I can't debug, as I'm
using
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #24 from Mike Stump mikestump at comcast dot net 2011-02-22
11:56:37 UTC ---
Iain reports it is fixed for him as well... :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
09:44:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Could you try building with the patch on a ppc box if you have one, without
the
Fix to tree.c in it, so that it will fail,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-02-21 10:03:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Could you try building with the patch on a ppc box if you have one, without
the
Fix to tree.c in it, so that it will
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21 10:08:51
UTC ---
there was no intention to create a hack (or any other form of expedient work);
... if it is wrong, then it is likely a mistake on my part when importing the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #18 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
10:44:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
(In reply to comment #15)
Could you try building with the patch on a ppc box if you have one,
without the
Fix to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #19 from Mike Stump mikestump at comcast dot net 2011-02-21
20:58:35 UTC ---
? The patch does touch rs6000 is the same way as we touch i386. I think there
is an additional issue on ppc. My previous patch is necessary, but not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #20 from Mike Stump mikestump at comcast dot net 2011-02-21
21:02:16 UTC ---
Ah, never mind, we have another thread going where the problem was pointed out.
Sorry for missing it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #21 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
21:38:23 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Feb 21 21:38:21 2011
New Revision: 170376
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170376
Log:
PR target/47822
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||*-darwin*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
15:05:00 UTC ---
Huh. WTF is this builtin used for at all??
int main()
{
return __builtin___CFStringMakeConstantString (Hello);
}
and at gimple stage we already have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-02-20
15:19:41 UTC ---
Well, the problem does not seem fully darwin specific. It also shows on
moxie-unknown-elf and may be to some extent on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
15:33:56 UTC ---
It will show on all targets without a builtin_decl hook and target builtins.
x86 is no such target, it shows there because of the darwin builtin not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
17:15:55 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Sun Feb 20 17:15:53 2011
New Revision: 170339
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170339
Log:
2011-02-20 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #8 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
18:10:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 23415
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23415
darwin patch (moxie is unrelated)
Here is a darwin patch. Not my
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
m...@gcc.gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-02-20 19:12:31 UTC ---
Dominique, can you try a build on ppc?
Mike, could you be more precise: do you want me to test the patch in comment #8
before or after updating to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #11 from Mike Stump mikestump at comcast dot net 2011-02-20
19:23:07 UTC ---
Could you try building with the patch on a ppc box if you have one, without the
Fix to tree.c in it, so that it will fail, if the problem isn't really fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-02-20 19:40:18 UTC ---
Could you try building with the patch on a ppc box if you have one, without
the
Fix to tree.c in it, so that it will fail, if the problem isn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #14 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
04:09:52 UTC ---
*** Bug 47826 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
24 matches
Mail list logo
