[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

2017-10-19 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

2017-07-19 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

2016-10-25 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 --- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #12) > GCJ has been removed from GCC 7. But on the other hand this isn't really so > much a java bug itself as it is an unwinding bug that java just happened to > be the

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

2016-10-25 Thread egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 --- Comment #12 from Eric Gallager --- GCJ has been removed from GCC 7. But on the other hand this isn't really so much a java bug itself as it is an unwinding bug that java just happened to be the one to tickle. So is it worth keeping this bug o

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

2013-09-16 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 --- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #10) > > what's the expectation/status here? > > I see that these test-cases still fail on x86_64-darwin12, with the latest > XCode tools. These failures are still pres

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

2013-09-14 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

2012-02-25 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 --- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-26 02:49:28 UTC --- Interestingly I see these failures in the i386-unknown-freebsd10.0 test results... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-02/msg02475.html as well as the x86_64-unknown-freebsd8.3

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

2011-03-18 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 --- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-18 17:28:19 UTC --- The response to Comments 5 through 7 from the darwin linker developer is... - Unfortunately, the _sigtramp functi

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

2011-03-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-18 08:53:03 UTC --- Looking at gcc-4.2, there is no darwin MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR for i?86 and for powerpc it doesn't call _Unwind_SetSignalFrame (xxx, 1) unlike e.g. linux MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FO

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

2011-03-18 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe 2011-03-18 08:32:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > That's something that has been fixed in PR26208 by adding S modifier for > signal > frames and introducing _Unwind_GetIPInfo. So, if Apple unwinder has that

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

2011-03-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

2011-03-17 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-18 00:45:08 UTC --- The darwin linker developer says This is not a tools bug. It worked by luck with Xcode3 tools. The is

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

2011-03-17 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-17 20:12:35 UTC --- Opened radar Problem ID: 9149679, Xcode 4.0 regresses Throw_2.exe libjava testcase. I wonder if this might just be a new permutation of the existing eh epilogue issues on darwin.

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

2011-03-12 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-12 21:31:36 UTC --- The same executable examined with Xcode 4.0's lldb shows... [MacPro:x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0/libjava/testsuite] howarth% /Developer/usr/bin/lldb ./Throw_2.exe Current executable set

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

2011-03-12 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-12 21:26:32 UTC --- Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc-4 COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/sw/lib/gcc4.6/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0/4.6.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0 Configured with: ../