[Bug target/49826] [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2012-01-01 15:33:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) The linker does not work very well with undecorated stdcall-s. For example: . But if that bug will be fixed, then this one c

[Bug target/49826] [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826 --- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz 2011-12-30 17:42:56 UTC --- Hmm, I am not that sure, if this is at all a bug, as linker can handle undecorated stdcall-s quite well as import. I am more curious for what purpose you actual need the @ decoration in co

[Bug target/49826] [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/49826] [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-10 11:59:41 UTC --- Patches should be posted to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org with a ChangeLog entry and a note how it was tested.

[Bug target/49826] [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-09-14 19:35:41 UTC --- Created attachment 25274 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25274 patch

[Bug target/49826] [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0