[Bug target/49881] [AVR] Inefficient stack manipulation around calls

2011-08-02 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49881 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug target/49881] [AVR] Inefficient stack manipulation around calls

2011-08-02 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49881 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/49881] [AVR] Inefficient stack manipulation around calls

2011-08-02 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49881 --- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson 2011-08-02 17:38:22 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Tue Aug 2 17:38:16 2011 New Revision: 177196 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177196 Log: PR target/49881 * config/avr/avr.md (push

[Bug target/49881] [AVR] Inefficient stack manipulation around calls

2011-08-01 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49881 --- Comment #8 from Richard Henderson 2011-08-01 19:35:46 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Mon Aug 1 19:35:43 2011 New Revision: 177071 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177071 Log: PR target/49881 * config/avr/avr.h (PUSH_

[Bug target/49881] [AVR] Inefficient stack manipulation around calls

2011-07-29 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49881 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-29 14:39:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Would one of you be so kind as to do a full test run? > I don't have avr-libc et al set up on this machine... Just running tests without regenerating li

[Bug target/49881] [AVR] Inefficient stack manipulation around calls

2011-07-28 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49881 --- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson 2011-07-28 16:14:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Regenerating avr-libc (with your patch atop r176818) fails with PR49864 and > the > exact line number from there. Do you need more food, or is the test

[Bug target/49881] [AVR] Inefficient stack manipulation around calls

2011-07-28 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49881 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||49864 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann

[Bug target/49881] [AVR] Inefficient stack manipulation around calls

2011-07-28 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49881 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24848|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/49881] [AVR] Inefficient stack manipulation around calls

2011-07-28 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49881 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #3 fro

[Bug target/49881] [AVR] Inefficient stack manipulation around calls

2011-07-27 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49881 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/49881] [AVR] Inefficient stack manipulation around calls

2011-07-27 Thread eric.weddington at atmel dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49881 --- Comment #1 from Eric Weddington 2011-07-27 23:13:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > Created attachment 24848 [details] > Hack to set ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS > > While looking at PR49864 I noticed some awful code. > > First, the argument