http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52294
--- Comment #12 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-08 08:57:59 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Fri Jun 8 08:57:53 2012
New Revision: 188332
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188332
Log:
2012-06-08 Joey Ye
Backport r184442
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52294
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52294
--- Comment #10 from Richard Earnshaw 2012-02-21
23:51:21 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Tue Feb 21 23:51:16 2012
New Revision: 184454
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184454
Log:
PR target/52294
* thumb2.md (thumb2_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52294
--- Comment #9 from Richard Earnshaw 2012-02-21
23:46:10 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Tue Feb 21 23:46:05 2012
New Revision: 184452
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184452
Log:
PR target/52294
* thumb2.md (thumb2_s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52294
--- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw 2012-02-21
15:38:40 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Tue Feb 21 15:38:35 2012
New Revision: 184442
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184442
Log:
PR target/52294
* thumb2.md (thumb2_s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52294
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52294
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52294
--- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2012-02-18
12:47:20 UTC ---
Or better:
Index: arm.md
===
--- arm.md(revision 184318)
+++ arm.md(working copy)
@@ -3505,7 +3505,7 @@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52294
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher 2012-02-18
12:46:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (If the pattern of comment #3 is to blame, then this ...
...probably fix it.
Index: arm.md
==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52294
--- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher 2012-02-18
12:36:29 UTC ---
(If the pattern of comment #3 is to blame, then this goes back all the way to
the check-in of that pattern, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=33028)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52294
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rearnsha at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52294
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw 2012-02-17
23:22:41 UTC ---
Confirmed.
lsls Rd, Rn, Rm
is only 2 bytes in size if Rd == Rn
Although the testcase only fails on trunk, the miscalculation is certain to be
present on all maintained branches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52294
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52294
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #1
14 matches
Mail list logo