http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52474
--- Comment #8 from wwieser at gmx dot de 2012-03-16 20:44:54 UTC ---
@Georg-Johann Lay: Thank you very much for that quick response.
> Obviously, the toolchain you use comes with bad patches.
>
I agree.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52474
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-14
13:03:54 UTC ---
Note: The assembler code in attachment 26890 is from
30-gcc-4.5.1-fixedpoint-3-4-2010.patch
http://distribute.atmel.no/tools/opensource/avr-gcc/gcc-4.5.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52474
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52474
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-14
12:54:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 26890
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26890
mulhisi.c:Test program
Test program showing that the non-FSF patches introduce a wrong multiply.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52474
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-14
11:11:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 26889
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26889
main.s: FSF Assembler output
Here is the assembler output of the main mudule generated with
$ av
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52474
--- Comment #3 from wwieser at gmx dot de 2012-03-14 01:19:59 UTC ---
OK, so talking to the debian maintainer, the GCC version I'm using is based
upon patches available here:
http://distribute.atmel.no/tools/opensource/avr-gcc/
Here is a test ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52474
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
