http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52480
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo 2013-02-03 22:29:46
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > As of rev 195493 the test case for this PR is failing again.
>
> In fact, now it doesn't work for little and big endian.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52480
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo 2013-01-28 20:44:03
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> As of rev 195493 the test case for this PR is failing again.
In fact, now it doesn't work for little and big endian.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52480
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52480
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52480
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo 2012-10-10 00:51:03
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Wed Oct 10 00:50:37 2012
New Revision: 192283
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192283
Log:
PR target/52480
* config/sh/sh.m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52480
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28391|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52480
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52480
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo 2012-10-08 18:00:25
UTC ---
Created attachment 28391
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28391
Proposed patch
Hm, the line
&& INTVAL (operands[3]) == -24 * (BITS_BIG_ENDIAN != BYTES_BIG_E
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52480
--- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-03-05
05:30:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 26831
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26831
A possible patch
Looks to be a similar problem with PR52394.
