[Bug target/54232] For x86 PIC code, ebx should be spillable

2014-11-08 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54232 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/54232] For x86 PIC code, ebx should be spillable

2014-11-07 Thread evstupac at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54232 Stupachenko Evgeny changed: What|Removed |Added CC||evstupac at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug target/54232] For x86 PIC code, ebx should be spillable

2012-08-13 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54232 --- Comment #3 from Rich Felker 2012-08-13 13:59:17 UTC --- > I think the GOT is introduced too late to do any fancy ananlysis > on whether we need it or not. This may be true, but if so, it's a highly suboptimal design that's hurting performanc

[Bug target/54232] For x86 PIC code, ebx should be spillable

2012-08-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54232 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-* Statu

[Bug target/54232] For x86 PIC code, ebx should be spillable

2012-08-11 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54232 --- Comment #1 from Rich Felker 2012-08-12 04:57:07 UTC --- By the way, the code that inspired this report is crypt_blowfish.c and the corresponding asm by Solar Designer. We've been experimenting with performance characteristics while integratin