[Bug target/56771] Integer Overflow? Building arm-rtems libgcc2

2013-07-10 Thread joel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/56771] Integer Overflow? Building arm-rtems libgcc2

2013-04-03 Thread joel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771 --- Comment #11 from Joel Sherrill 2013-04-03 15:39:47 UTC --- Created attachment 29797 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29797 Patch for 4.6 and 4.7

[Bug target/56771] Integer Overflow? Building arm-rtems libgcc2

2013-04-03 Thread joel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/56771] Integer Overflow? Building arm-rtems libgcc2

2013-04-03 Thread sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771 --- Comment #9 from Sebastian Huber 2013-04-03 15:23:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Patch committed to 4.7, 4.8 and SVN head. > > Closing. Can you please commit this also to the 4.6 branch.

[Bug target/56771] Integer Overflow? Building arm-rtems libgcc2

2013-04-03 Thread joel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/56771] Integer Overflow? Building arm-rtems libgcc2

2013-04-03 Thread joel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771 --- Comment #7 from Joel Sherrill 2013-04-03 14:43:16 UTC --- Created attachment 29796 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29796 Patch to libcpp/configure.ac

[Bug target/56771] Integer Overflow? Building arm-rtems libgcc2

2013-04-02 Thread chris at contemporary dot net.au
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771 --- Comment #6 from Chris Johns 2013-04-02 11:04:29 UTC --- It looks to me like libcpp/configure.ac is not setting 'need_64bit_hwint' to 'yes'. It looks like the RTEMS ptch to change arm-rtems*eabi to arm-rtems* needs to have this added.

[Bug target/56771] Integer Overflow? Building arm-rtems libgcc2

2013-04-01 Thread chris at contemporary dot net.au
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771 --- Comment #5 from Chris Johns 2013-04-02 06:28:32 UTC --- A cygwin cross-compile also fails as it is a 32bit host. The failure is not specific to Linux. This means RTEMS users have problems building from source on Windows as cygwin cu

[Bug target/56771] Integer Overflow? Building arm-rtems libgcc2

2013-04-01 Thread chris at contemporary dot net.au
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771 --- Comment #4 from Chris Johns 2013-04-02 06:23:53 UTC --- Created attachment 29771 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29771 xgcc dumps from a cygwin build that also fails. The file contains all the gcc trace and dump

[Bug target/56771] Integer Overflow? Building arm-rtems libgcc2

2013-03-29 Thread joel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added Host||centos-6.4/i686 --- Comment #3

[Bug target/56771] Integer Overflow? Building arm-rtems libgcc2

2013-03-28 Thread joel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771 --- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2013-03-28 20:12:06 UTC --- Created attachment 29748 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29748 Full build log In case there is something useful in the build log. Host: CentOS 6.4.

[Bug target/56771] Integer Overflow? Building arm-rtems libgcc2

2013-03-28 Thread joel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771 --- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2013-03-28 20:10:34 UTC --- Created attachment 29747 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29747 Preprocessed code that fails to build I don't think this code is in error. At least I don't