[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect Alignment of access forced using peeling 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #19 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- This may be now fixed ...

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect Alignment of access forced using peeling 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #20 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #19) This may be now fixed ... I believe it is! Nice work. I don't see vect-96.c failing anymore on r207423 of trunk. The last

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect Alignment of access forced using peeling 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 3 Feb 2014, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #20 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect Alignment of access forced using peeling 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect Alignment of access forced using peeling 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #23 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #20) (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #19) This may be now fixed ... I believe it is! Nice work. I don't see vect-96.c failing

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect Alignment of access forced using peeling 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect Alignment of access forced using peeling 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 31110 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31110action=edit revised patch Hmm, try this one.

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect Alignment of access forced using peeling 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #16 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks, testing in progress.

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect Alignment of access forced using peeling 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #17 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Initial news is not good -- I am seeing a lot of ICEs go by as the testing proceeds, including in vect-96.c and vect-42.c.

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect Alignment of access forced using peeling 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #18 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- spawn /home/wschmidt/gcc/build/gcc-mainline-test2/gcc/xgcc -B/home/wschmidt/gcc /build/gcc-mainline-test2/gcc/ /home/wschmidt/gcc/gcc-mainline-test2/gcc/testsu

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect Alignment of access forced using peeling 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect Alignment of access forced using peeling 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 31103 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31103action=edit untested patch Patch I am testing on x86_64-linux - can you give ppc/ppc64 a try?

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect Alignment of access forced using peeling 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks, Richi -- yes, I'll give this a try later today (lots of meetings in the way but I'll get to it sooner or later). Bill

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect Alignment of access forced using peeling 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect Alignment of access forced using peeling 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #31103|0 |1 is

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect Alignment of access forced using peeling 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #14 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi Richi, Passes bootstrap on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu and fixes this test, but breaks two others: 57,60c57,68 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect