https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57202
--- Comment #10 from Thiago Macieira ---
> But that's what this bug report is for - to make the intrinsicsalways
available.
I never asked for them to be available in undecorated functions. Yes, that's
how both the Intel and Microsoft compilers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57202
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey Walton ---
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:04 AM, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57202
>
> --- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
> (In reply to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57202
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #7)
> It appears the intrinsics are not available.
They are available for functions compiled for a suitable target, for instance
because of -march or thanks to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57202
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey Walton ---
Please forgive my ignorance... What was fixed?
The problem statement is/was "Please make all headers for intrinsics be
includable without special compiler flags." But it appears the intrinsics are
not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57202
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can this be closed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57202
--- Comment #5 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #4)
Can this be closed?
Oh, yeah, this is working fine in GCC 4.9.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57202
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57202
Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* |x86_64-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57202
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* arm-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57202
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-08 08:02:23
UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00740.html
that patch (or maybe a later iteration) is waiting for reviews but I think it
is what this PR is
10 matches
Mail list logo