http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631
--- Comment #12 from pebbles at riseup dot net ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #10)
> I can have a look at it, but it might take a month or so until I get back to
> this issue.
>
> If I understand correctly, bottom line of what you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
I can have a look at it, but it might take a month or so until I get back to
this issue.
If I understand correctly, bottom line of what you need is that avr-gcc does
not warn for ISR names that are not of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631
pebbles at riseup dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|pebbles
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631
--- Comment #8 from pebbles at riseup dot net ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #7)
> (In reply to pebbles from comment #6)
>
> > This seems like a very small patch that makes GCC more extendable and
> > accurate. I am not too attach
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631
--- Comment #6 from pebbles at riseup dot net ---
You seem to be speaking from an assumption that this warning code should not
change. Is there a reason for not adding this small patch, which makes gcc
more extendable and accurate?
(In reply to G
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to pebbles from comment #4)
> (In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #3)
>> Would you explain what you are trying to achieve?
>
> For one thing, I'm coding in C++, so the handlers may be mang
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631
--- Comment #4 from pebbles at riseup dot net ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #3)
> Would you explain what you are trying to achieve?
For one thing, I'm coding in C++, so the handlers may be mangled to the wrong
symbols unless I tel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
Priority|P3
11 matches
Mail list logo
