https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57982
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz ---
The problem here is the use of weak on pe-coff. The change you see on gcc is
just addressing the fact that for 64-bit the weak symbol never can get 0 due
relocation-limitations.
We try to address this.
On the ot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57982
Jean-Pierre Flori changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jpflori at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57982
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57982
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i686-*-mingw32
|
