http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58426
Martin Husemann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58426
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58426
--- Comment #3 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
Hm, the initial PLUS part looks a bit like what I ment to fix with a recent
patch. How old is your checkout? My fix was committed as r202600 /
git:3719e41cf6b9d. So I hope I didn't break something else. (T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58426
--- Comment #2 from Martin Husemann ---
The more interesting XEXP(x, 0) of that rtx is the one triggering the failure:
$15 = {code = REG, mode = SImode, jump = 0, call = 0, unchanging = 0,
volatil = 0, in_struct = 0, used = 0, frame_related =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58426
--- Comment #1 from Martin Husemann ---
The error happens here:
#1 0x002d15ca in output_addr_const (file=0x7f5b79c8,
x=0x7f10a250, 2136701384, 2131796560) at ../../gcc-4.8.1/gcc/final.c:3877
#2 0x002d1466 in output_addr_const (file=0x7f5b7
