http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59396
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Mar 14 09:27:19 2014
New Revision: 208562
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208562root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/59396
* config/avr/avr.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59396
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Mar 14 09:41:51 2014
New Revision: 208564
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208564root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from 2014-03-14 trunk r208562.
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59396
--- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Mar 14 09:52:07 2014
New Revision: 208565
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208565root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from 2014-03-14 trunk r208562.
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59396
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P4 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59396
--- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Nowak from comment #5)
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #4)
As the patch above has not been approved, it's unlikely this will ever get
fixed...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59396
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31898
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31898action=edit
pr59396.diff: Tentative patch for avr.c
PR target/59396
* config/avr/avr.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59396
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59396
Martin Nowak code at dawg dot eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||code at dawg dot eu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59396
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Nowak from comment #3)
Is there a simple workaround until this is fixed?
None that I know of, at least if you don't want to change the sources.
As the patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59396
--- Comment #5 from Martin Nowak code at dawg dot eu ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #4)
As the patch above has not been approved, it's unlikely this will ever get
fixed...
This should have a high priority, it makes LTO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59396
--- Comment #6 from pieter.agten at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Martin Nowak from comment #5)
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #4)
As the patch above has not been approved, it's unlikely this will ever get
fixed...
This should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59396
--- Comment #7 from Ian Thompson ijt5 at cornell dot edu ---
(In reply to Martin Nowak from comment #5)
This should have a high priority, it makes LTO completely unusable on AVR.
I've been building with LTO for AVR without issue. The warning is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59396
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
13 matches
Mail list logo