http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61131

--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpelinux at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Stephen Warren from comment #3)
> Or is the definition of
> undefined such that it propagates through the entire expression irrespective
> of the expression's logic?

It is.  Once execution hits undefined behaviour all bets are off.

"Undefined" is not some unspecified value you can choose to ignore.

Reply via email to