--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-03
21:03 ---
This will be fixed on Solaris in the upcoming 4.0.0.
--
What|Removed |Added
S
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-16
22:42 ---
Subject: Bug 6123
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-16 22:42:21
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
gcc/config : so
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-11-10
05:13 ---
No, actually not the next day, but a few days later. Incidentally, the (a) and
(b) are from an earlier reply of mine on this subject:
On most other targets, -fpic, ie. flag_pic, means two things:
a) gene
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-11-10
05:07 ---
I made the following reply the day after I said I'd poke around. Somehow it
seems to be missing from the gcc-patches archive. Anyway, here it is again:
I grepped through the entire slackware linux sour
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-11-08 21:23
---
Subject: Re: __pic__/__PIC__ not defined when -fpic/-fPIC is specified
Ah. This is why I thought it had already been done. Maybe you want
to poke Alan Modra about the research he said he would do?
zw
-
--- Additional Comments From kghazi at verizon dot net 2004-11-08 20:45
---
Subject: Re: __pic__/__PIC__ not defined when -fpic/-fPIC is specified
I submitted a patch to fix this back in April:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04.argh/msg00168.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bu
--- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-08 20:37
---
I've filed bug 18382 for the general solution to this problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6123
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||18382
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6123
