https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin12 |x86_64-apple-darwin1*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Could this PR get some attention please? To have an idea about how "fun" it is,
look at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-06/msg01182.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4)
> 3.
>
> Anyway, assuming that the intention is to unwrap the indirection from the call
> - something like: ...
The following patch fixes the failures (not co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> This is a google branch rev.
211088 is OK the revision that triggers the fail is
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=211089
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
--- Comment #2 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin13 |x86_64-apple-darwin12
|
