https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||275438859 at qq dot com
--- Comment #58
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Ivan D Vasin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nisavid at gmail dot com
--- Comment #57
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #56 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Thu Dec 18 20:12:44 2014
New Revision: 218873
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218873&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/61407
* config/darwin-c.c (version_as_ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #55 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Derrick Kay from comment #53)
If you just want the gfortran compiler for Yosemite, either install the gcc49
package under the fink (http://www.finkproject.org), MacPorts
(http:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #54 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to Derrick Kay from comment #53)
I've redirected that question to the mailing list (and answered it):
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-11/msg00088.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Derrick Kay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||derrick.k at gmx dot de
--- Comment #53 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #52 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
Attachment 33932 should be superseded by attachment 33970 from bug 63810.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #51 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
> Created attachment 33932 [details]
> Patch for gcc 4.8 branch (based on gcc 4.8.3)
The test results for this 4.8.3 GCC with the above patch are good:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #50 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
---
As this bug is now marked as resolved, I've filed #63810 to address the
remaining issues. Lawrence Velázquez is working on a
patch to address the issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #49 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #45)
> (In reply to Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia from comment #42)
> > The committed patch is incorrect. It makes an invalid assumption which
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #48 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Created attachment 33932
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33932&action=edit
Patch for gcc 4.8 branch (based on gcc 4.8.3)
This is the patch for GCC 4.8 branch (here based on 4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-apple-darwin14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at bromo dot med
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cloverm at leidos dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #43 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
---
Created attachment 33824
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33824&action=edit
gcc 4.2 based patch which handles tiny version numbers properly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeremyhu at macports dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #41 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Mon Sep 29 18:40:57 2014
New Revision: 215690
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215690&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/61407
* config/darwin-c.c (version_as_ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #40 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sun Sep 14 08:05:43 2014
New Revision: 215251
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215251&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/61407
* config/darwin-c.c (version_as_ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #39 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
(In reply to Lawrence Velázquez from comment #38)
> 2) You should report this bug upstream.
>
> http://compiler-rt.llvm.org
On second thought, they probably won't accept it because the patch is inva
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #38 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
Created attachment 33464
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33464&action=edit
Corrected dirent patch
Couple of things:
1) The version of Sanitizer included with GCC 4.9.1 at least, a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #37 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
Okay, what I said initially was correct. This was the specific change I made.
https://gist.github.com/larryv/9b1cd34a34733c10f734
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #36 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
(In reply to Lawrence Velázquez from comment #34)
> I got the build to succeed by changing
>
> # if defined(_DARWIN_FEATURE_64_BIT_INODE)
>
> to
>
> # if ! defined(__DARWIN_64_BIT_INO_T) || _
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #35 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
Created attachment 33461
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33461&action=edit
MacPorts log from a failed attempt to build libgcc @4.9.1_0 (x86_64)
There’s a lot of text, I know. To se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||larryv at macports dot org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #33 from James Clarke ---
(In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #30)
> The proposed changes in v4 of the patch aren't building here on 10.9. I
> don't see how
>
> # if defined(_DARWIN_FEATURE_64_BIT_INODE)
>
> can completely substi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #32 from James Clarke ---
(In reply to Ilya Mikhaltsou from comment #31)
> (In reply to James Clarke from comment #29)
> > (In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #28)
> > > I noticed that MacPorts is using…
> > >
> > > #if SANITIZER_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #31 from Ilya Mikhaltsou ---
(In reply to James Clarke from comment #29)
> (In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #28)
> > I noticed that MacPorts is using…
> >
> > #if SANITIZER_MAC && ( !defined(__DARWIN_64_BIT_INO_T) ||
> > __DARW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #30 from Jack Howarth ---
The proposed changes in v4 of the patch aren't building here on 10.9. I don't
see how
# if defined(_DARWIN_FEATURE_64_BIT_INODE)
can completely substitute for…
# if ! defined(__DARWIN_64_BIT_INO_T) || __DA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #29 from James Clarke ---
(In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #28)
> I noticed that MacPorts is using…
>
> #if SANITIZER_MAC && ( !defined(__DARWIN_64_BIT_INO_T) ||
> __DARWIN_64_BIT_INO_T)
>
> and
>
> # if ! defined(__DARWIN_6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #27 from James Clarke ---
Updated patches: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg02415.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #26 from James Clarke ---
Patches have been sent to the mailing list -
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg02344.html and
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg02345.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #25 from James Clarke ---
(In reply to Dominyk Tiller from comment #24)
> It looks like gcc are gonna require someone to submit this patch to their
> mailing list before we see any further activity on this. Could you possibly
> do tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #24 from Dominyk Tiller ---
(In reply to James Clarke from comment #16)
> Created attachment 33180 [details]
> Patch For GCC 4.9.1 On Yosemite
>
> Requires DP 4 (or above), as I have also removed the fix for Availability.h
> which wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #22 from Eric Martin ---
Was your gcc.rb git post intended as a replacement file for gcc.rb, or as a
patch for it? Either way, using it for either purpose has been unsuccessful for
me. I am getting:
/usr/bin/patch: malformed patc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #21 from aggrostyle at gmail dot com ---
Thank you! It worked perfect last night!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #20 from James Clarke ---
(In reply to aggrostyle from comment #18)
> Guys, a question... how can i apply the patch? I've read that i have to add:
>
> patch do
> url "https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33180";
> s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #19 from Alexander Bock ---
(In reply to aggrostyle from comment #18)
> Guys, a question... how can i apply the patch? I've read that i have to add:
>
> patch do
> url "https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33180";
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
aggrostyle at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aggrostyle at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Alexander Bock changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexandermbock at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #16 from James Clarke ---
Created attachment 33180
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33180&action=edit
Patch For GCC 4.9.1 On Yosemite
Requires DP 4 (or above), as I have also removed the fix for Availability.h
whi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #15 from James Clarke ---
(In reply to James Clarke from comment #14)
> The issue with Availability.h has been fixed as of Developer Preview 4,
> however `all-stage1-target-libsanitizer` still fails with Error 2.
I should note that I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
James Clarke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com
--- Comment #14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Dominyk Tiller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominyktiller at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Eric Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericmark26 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #10 from Ilya Mikhaltsou ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #9)
> (In reply to Ilya Mikhaltsou from comment #8)
> > Created attachment 32949 [details]
> > Patch to compile gcc on OS X 10.10 Yosemite
> >
> > Fixed every
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Ilya Mikhaltsou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||morpheby at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
So it turns out there is a defect report against the C, see PR 36453 but that
is only for #elif and not #if defined(a) && a()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||denji0k at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab ---
This has nothing to do with evaluation, it's a syntax error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #3 from kassafari at gmail dot com ---
Alright, reported to apple as well [:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Looks like the Mac OS X's headers are not C99/C++98 compatible at all:
>
> /Applications/Xcode6-Beta.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/
> Develope
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks like the Mac OS X's headers are not C99/C++98 compatible at all:
/Applications/Xcode6-Beta.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.10.sdk/usr/include/Availability.h:174
57 matches
Mail list logo
