[Bug target/62662] [4.9/5 Regression] Miscompilation of Qt on s390x

2014-10-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/62662] [4.9/5 Regression] Miscompilation of Qt on s390x

2014-09-19 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Fri Sep 19 09:20:38 2014 New Revision: 215383 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215383&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-09-19 Andreas Krebbel PR target/62662 * config/s390/s

[Bug target/62662] [4.9/5 Regression] Miscompilation of Qt on s390x

2014-09-19 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Fri Sep 19 09:14:59 2014 New Revision: 215381 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215381&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-09-19 Andreas Krebbel PR target/62662 * config/s390/s

[Bug target/62662] [4.9/5 Regression] Miscompilation of Qt on s390x

2014-09-04 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel --- Created attachment 33450 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33450&action=edit Experimental patch I'm currently bootstrapping this patch with various combinations. It will take some time.

[Bug target/62662] [4.9/5 Regression] Miscompilation of Qt on s390x

2014-09-03 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) I agree that this is something we need to fix in the back-end. I was just curious about when this surfaced first and keep that info for the records.

[Bug target/62662] [4.9/5 Regression] Miscompilation of Qt on s390x

2014-09-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- That is perhaps where we started to have %r11 clobbered in the routine (therefore pro_and_epilogue wanted to save %r11-%r15), and all the %r11 uses later disappear because of later passes (I think cprop_hardr

[Bug target/62662] [4.9/5 Regression] Miscompilation of Qt on s390x

2014-09-02 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug target/62662] [4.9/5 Regression] Miscompilation of Qt on s390x

2014-09-02 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/62662] [4.9/5 Regression] Miscompilation of Qt on s390x

2014-09-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---