subject:"\[Bug target\/63521\] The AArch64 backend doesn't define REG_ALLOC

[Bug target/63521] The AArch64 backend doesn't define REG_ALLOC_ORDER.

2024-09-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63521 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- For future reference here are the 2 discussions about REG_ALLOC_ORDER for aarch64 https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/n998ucjwgk1@arm.com/ https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/mptjzxhperg@arm

[Bug target/63521] The AArch64 backend doesn't define REG_ALLOC_ORDER.

2024-09-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63521 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug target/63521] The AArch64 backend doesn't define REG_ALLOC_ORDER.

2024-09-02 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63521 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NE

[Bug target/63521] The AArch64 backend doesn't define REG_ALLOC_ORDER.

2021-05-04 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63521 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|jiwang at gcc

[Bug target/63521] The AArch64 backend doesn't define REG_ALLOC_ORDER.

2021-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63521 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/63521] The AArch64 backend doesn't define REG_ALLOC_ORDER.

2016-07-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63521 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|FIXED

[Bug target/63521] The AArch64 backend doesn't define REG_ALLOC_ORDER.

2015-07-24 Thread jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63521 --- Comment #5 from Jiong Wang --- Author: jiwang Date: Fri Jul 24 09:06:53 2015 New Revision: 226141 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226141&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [AArch64] Revert REG_ALLOC_ORDER/HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER 2015-07-24 Jiong Wa

[Bug target/63521] The AArch64 backend doesn't define REG_ALLOC_ORDER.

2015-07-22 Thread jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63521 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/63521] The AArch64 backend doesn't define REG_ALLOC_ORDER.

2015-07-22 Thread jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63521 --- Comment #3 from Jiong Wang --- Author: jiwang Date: Wed Jul 22 11:41:10 2015 New Revision: 226064 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226064&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [AArch64] PR target/63521 Define REG_ALLOC_ORDER 2015-07-22 Jiong Wang

[Bug target/63521] The AArch64 backend doesn't define REG_ALLOC_ORDER.

2015-06-23 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63521 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/63521] The AArch64 backend doesn't define REG_ALLOC_ORDER.

2014-10-13 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63521 --- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw --- Ideally, a port should not need to define reg_alloc_order; it's rather a blunt instrument. Better would be for the register allocator to have a better understanding of which registers are being used for p