https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63596
--- Comment #5 from Jiong Wang ---
Author: jiwang
Date: Fri May 27 13:05:34 2016
New Revision: 236819
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236819&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] PR target/63596, honor tree-stdarg analysis result to improve VAAR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63596
Jiong Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63596
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63596
--- Comment #4 from Jiong Wang ---
A patch set which clean up variable argument support on AArch64 has been sent
for review
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg00508.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63596
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63596
--- Comment #2 from Jiong Wang ---
we are also lack of initialization for va_list_gpr_counter_field and
va_list_vpr_counter_field, thus currently the whole tree-stdarg optimization
doesn't work for AArch64, and lots of other targets, like arm, sp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63596
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jiong Wang from comment #2)
> we are also lack of initialization for va_list_gpr_counter_field and
> va_list_vpr_counter_field, thus currently the whole tree-stdarg optimization
> doesn't work fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63596
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63596
Jiong Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED