https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66511
Wilhelm M changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||klaus.doldinger64@googlemai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66511
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66511
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Matthijs Kooijman from comment #2)
So, IIUC, this is quite hard to fix? Either you use lib functions, which
prevents the optimizer from just relabeling or coyping
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66511
--- Comment #2 from Matthijs Kooijman matthijs at stdin dot nl ---
So, IIUC, this is quite hard to fix? Either you use lib functions, which
prevents the optimizer from just relabeling or coyping registers to apply
shifting, or you don't and then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66511
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66511
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Matthijs Kooijman from comment #0)
I haven't found a readily available 5.x package yet to test.
It's the same.
As you can see, the versions operating on 64 bit
