https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christian.gnu at juner dot de
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #20 from Goswin von Brederlow ---
So it's been a year since my last comment. Is this dead or is someone still
working on it? It would be a nice addition to gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.4 |6.5
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #17 from Goswin von Brederlow ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #16)
> (In reply to Goswin von Brederlow from comment #15)
>
> > > No. We only do it for data pushed onto stack by CPU.
> >
> > I was thinking of something like:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Goswin von Brederlow from comment #15)
> > No. We only do it for data pushed onto stack by CPU.
>
> I was thinking of something like:
>
> __attribute__ ((interrupt("save_regs")))
> void
> f (struc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #15 from Goswin von Brederlow ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> (In reply to Goswin von Brederlow from comment #13)
> > > > Secondly why pass error_code as argument if is already on the stack and
> > > > could be accessed t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Goswin von Brederlow from comment #13)
> > >
> > > In a kernel there will always be some exception that simply prints a
> > > register dump and stack backtrace. So again how do you access the origin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #13 from Goswin von Brederlow ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12)
> (In reply to Goswin von Brederlow from comment #11)
> > I think the design is fundamentally lacking in the following points:
> >
> > 1. interrupt handler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Goswin von Brederlow from comment #11)
> I think the design is fundamentally lacking in the following points:
>
> 1. interrupt handler must be declared with a mandatory pointer argument:
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
Goswin von Brederlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||goswin-v-b at web dot de
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Created attachment 38653 [details]
> A patch
>
> Please try this.
The patch fixes the issue, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 38653
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38653&action=edit
A patch
Please try this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Added:
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr68037-1.c
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr68037-2.c
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr68037-3.c
These tests fail on darwin:
Und
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception hand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.0 |6.2
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
Updated spec to clarify MXCSR register, x87 FPU and MMX register state:
The interrupt and exception handlers are called by x86 processors. X86
hardware pushes information onto stack and calls the handler. The
re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
The current specification:
The interrupt and exception handlers are called by x86 processors. X86
hardware pushes information onto stack and calls the handler. The
requirements are
1. Both interrupt and excepti
24 matches
Mail list logo
