https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
--- Comment #17 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Fredrik Hederstierna from comment #16)
> Could this fix also possibly improve:
> Bug 67507 - "Code size increase with -Os from GCC 4.8.x to GCC 4.9.x for ARM
> thumb1", which also seems r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
Fredrik Hederstierna changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fredrik.hederstierna@securi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
--- Comment #15 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Revision: 228644
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Fri Oct 9 11:08:05 2015
--
--- svn:log (or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
--- Comment #13 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Oct 9 10:53:31 2015
New Revision: 228643
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228643&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Patch PR target/67366 1/2] [ARM] - Add movmisalignhi / si patter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
--- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3)
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
> >
> > --- Comment #2 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
--- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #10)
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
> >
> > --- Comment #9 from Richa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
>
> --- Comment #9 from Richard Earnshaw ---
> Does that really do the right thing?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
--- Comment #9 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Does that really do the right thing? That is, does force_reg understand a
misaligned memory op?
Also, what if one memory operand is aligned, but the other not? Don't we want
to have the right combinatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
--- Comment #8 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #7)
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, ramana at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
> >
> > --- Comment #6 from Ramana Rad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, ramana at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
>
> --- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3)
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
> >
> > --- Comment #2 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3)
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
> >
> > --- Comment #2 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
>
> --- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I think this boils down to the fact that memcpy expansion is done too late
> and
> that (with more recent GCC) the "inlining" done on the GIMPLE level is
> re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
17 matches
Mail list logo
