[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

2016-03-07 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 --- Comment #20 from Christophe Lyon --- Author: clyon Date: Mon Mar 7 08:18:25 2016 New Revision: 234019 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234019&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-03-07 Christophe Lyon Backport from mainline 2

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

2016-02-16 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 --- Comment #19 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Feb 16 15:11:26 2016 New Revision: 233454 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233454&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] PR target/65932: stop changing signedness in PROMOT

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

2016-02-04 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

2016-02-04 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 --- Comment #17 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Feb 4 09:57:36 2016 New Revision: 233134 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233134&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM][4/4] Adjust gcc.target/arm/wmul-[123].c tests

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

2016-02-04 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 --- Comment #16 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Feb 4 09:56:13 2016 New Revision: 233133 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233133&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [cse][3/4] Don't overwrite original rtx when folding sour

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

2016-02-04 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 --- Comment #15 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Feb 4 09:54:37 2016 New Revision: 233132 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233132&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM][2/4] Fix operand costing logic for SMUL[TB][TB]

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

2016-02-04 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 --- Comment #14 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Feb 4 09:51:35 2016 New Revision: 233131 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233131&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM][1/4] PR target/65932: Add testcase PR targ

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

2016-02-04 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 --- Comment #13 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Feb 4 09:50:12 2016 New Revision: 233130 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233130&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] PR target/65932: stop changing signedness in PROMOT

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

2016-02-03 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 --- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #11) > Hi Kyrill, > > > For this failure (among others) I proposed the series at: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg01713.html > > Ah - m

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

2016-02-03 Thread nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 --- Comment #11 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Kyrill, > For this failure (among others) I proposed the series at: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg01713.html Ah - much better! I have approved the parts of your series that I can, In f

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

2016-02-01 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 --- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi Nick, For this failure (among others) I proposed the series at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg01713.html that changes the PROMOTE_MODE implementation on arm to be consistent

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

2016-02-01 Thread nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 f

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

2016-01-14 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #8 fr

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

2016-01-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Component|middle-end