[Bug target/68865] [6 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c fails since r231165

2015-12-14 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68865 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68865] [6 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c fails since r231165

2015-12-14 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68865 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Mon Dec 14 16:13:33 2015 New Revision: 231621 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231621&root=gcc&view=rev Log: rs6000: Fix a mistake in cstore_si_as_di (PR68865, PR68879) convert

[Bug target/68865] [6 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c fails since r231165

2015-12-12 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68865 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anton at samba dot org --- Comment

[Bug target/68865] [6 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c fails since r231165

2015-12-11 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68865 --- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt --- That's very possible. No doubt r231165 just caused it to come out of the woodwork again. However, I verified that it didn't ICE with r230600 - r231164, so something about r231165 managed to trigger the issue

[Bug target/68865] [6 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c fails since r231165

2015-12-11 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68865 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/68865] [6 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c fails since r231165

2015-12-11 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68865 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0