[Bug target/69198] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vmovaps-1.c scan-assembler-times vmovaps[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%xmm[0-9]+[^\n]*\\){%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1

2016-01-14 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69198 --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak --- *** Bug 68698 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/69198] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vmovaps-1.c scan-assembler-times vmovaps[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%xmm[0-9]+[^\n]*\\){%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1

2016-01-12 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69198 --- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Jan 12 19:57:56 2016 New Revision: 232295 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232295&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix alignment check in AVX-512 masked store Backport from

[Bug target/69198] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vmovaps-1.c scan-assembler-times vmovaps[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%xmm[0-9]+[^\n]*\\){%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1

2016-01-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69198 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69198] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vmovaps-1.c scan-assembler-times vmovaps[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%xmm[0-9]+[^\n]*\\){%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1

2016-01-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69198 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 12 13:20:33 2016 New Revision: 232268 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232268&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/69198 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_special_

[Bug target/69198] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vmovaps-1.c scan-assembler-times vmovaps[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%xmm[0-9]+[^\n]*\\){%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1

2016-01-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69198 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 37283 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37283&action=edit A different patch I am testing this.

[Bug target/69198] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vmovaps-1.c scan-assembler-times vmovaps[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%xmm[0-9]+[^\n]*\\){%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1

2016-01-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69198 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/69198] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vmovaps-1.c scan-assembler-times vmovaps[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%xmm[0-9]+[^\n]*\\){%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1

2016-01-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69198 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- That patch is correct, the bug is in ix86_expand_special_args_builtin.

[Bug target/69198] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vmovaps-1.c scan-assembler-times vmovaps[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%xmm[0-9]+[^\n]*\\){%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1

2016-01-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69198 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/69198] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vmovaps-1.c scan-assembler-times vmovaps[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%xmm[0-9]+[^\n]*\\){%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1

2016-01-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69198 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|