https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69667
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69667
--- Comment #11 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Feb 4 21:05:14 2016
New Revision: 233147
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233147&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-02-04 Michael Meissner
PR target/69667
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69667
--- Comment #9 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 37582
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37582&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69667
--- Comment #10 from Michael Meissner ---
I agree it is better to use the right constraints, but it can be easy to
overlook things, especially since reload didn't raise an error.
Particularly when you are using the various iterators and attribut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69667
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #7)
> The error is LRA requires that every register that a constraint targets be a
> valid register for the mode. In this case, the 3 move insns that target
> TF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69667
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69667
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Choosing alt 3 in insn 9: (0) ws (1) j {*movtf_64bit_dm}
Creating newreg=229 from oldreg=171, assigning class VSX_REGS to r229
9: r229:TF=0.0
REG_EQUAL 0.0
Inserting insn r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69667
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #3)
> ... but fails with -mcpu=power8.
Yeah. I forgot to mention that I configure gcc with --with-cpu=power8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69667
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #3)
> ... but fails with -mcpu=power8.
Yeah. I forgot to mention that I configure gcc with --with-cpu=power8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69667
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
... but fails with -mcpu=power8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69667
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Does not fail on gcc110 (P7 BE).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69667
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69667
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
13 matches
Mail list logo