[Bug target/69875] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong barrier placement for 64-bit atomic loads on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69875 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.5 |4.9.4

[Bug target/69875] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong barrier placement for 64-bit atomic loads on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69875 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/69875] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong barrier placement for 64-bit atomic loads on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69875 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Mar 29 13:32:37 2016 New Revision: 234522 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234522&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM][4.9 Backport] PR target/69875 Fix atomic_loaddi expa

[Bug target/69875] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong barrier placement for 64-bit atomic loads on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69875 --- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Mar 29 13:28:34 2016 New Revision: 234521 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234521&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM][5 Backport] PR target/69875 Fix atomic_loaddi expans

[Bug target/69875] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong barrier placement for 64-bit atomic loads on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69875 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong |[4.9/5 Regression] Wrong