https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73350
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73350
--- Comment #8 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Thu Jun 8 11:24:50 2017
New Revision: 249009
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249009=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR73350][PR80862] Improve subst for RC-capable insns.
PR target/73350,80862
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73350
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> The "simplest" way would be to have separate UNSPECs for all ops (but that
> explodes the number of unspecs I guess).
Would that be so bad? As far as gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73350
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
> The "simplest" way would be to have separate UNSPECs for all ops (but that
> explodes the number of unspecs I guess). Currently we get
>
> (insn 21 20 22 (parallel [
> (set (reg:V16SF 110)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73350
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73350
--- Comment #4 from Wenzel Jakob ---
This bug is still present in the latest GCC -- are there any plans to fix it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73350
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 39462
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39462=edit
gcc7-pr73350-wip.patch
Untested patch with what I had in mind for the mask operands. Perhaps some
extra arch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73350
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73350
--- Comment #1 from Wenzel Jakob ---
Sorry, there was a stupid typo in my message below. The middle part should have
read
At optimization level, -O1, this currently stops working (tested with GCC
trunk):
$ g++