https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78118
--- Comment #6 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jcmvbkbc
Date: Wed May 31 00:05:01 2017
New Revision: 248713
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248713&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
xtensa: Fix PR target/78118
It started failing after the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78118
jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78118
--- Comment #4 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jcmvbkbc
Date: Tue Nov 1 17:16:33 2016
New Revision: 241748
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241748&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
xtensa: Fix PR target/78118
It started failing after the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78118
--- Comment #3 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 39936
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39936&action=edit
tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78118
--- Comment #2 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The change that made xtensa backend go ICE looks completely unrelated, and
indeed, the issue is caused by the side effect of compute_frame_size() function
call hidden in the INITIAL_ELIMINATION_O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78118
jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
