[Bug target/79240] [7 Regression] ICE in s390_extzv_shift_ok, at config/s390/s390.c:2475

2017-01-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79240] [7 Regression] ICE in s390_extzv_shift_ok, at config/s390/s390.c:2475

2017-01-30 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Mon Jan 30 09:54:58 2017 New Revision: 245022 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245022&root=gcc&view=rev Log: S/390: PR target/79240: Fix assertion in s390_extzv_shift_ok. 2017-01

[Bug target/79240] [7 Regression] ICE in s390_extzv_shift_ok, at config/s390/s390.c:2475

2017-01-26 Thread vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240 --- Comment #6 from Dominik Vogt --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Looking around, I see various spots that need cleanup: > sizeof (HOST_WIDE_INT) * BITS_PER_UNIT should be IMHO HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT > 1ULL in unsigned HOST_WIDE_

[Bug target/79240] [7 Regression] ICE in s390_extzv_shift_ok, at config/s390/s390.c:2475

2017-01-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Looking around, I see various spots that need cleanup: sizeof (HOST_WIDE_INT) * BITS_PER_UNIT should be IMHO HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT 1ULL in unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT contexts HOST_WIDE_INT_1U, 0ULL HOST_WIDE_INT

[Bug target/79240] [7 Regression] ICE in s390_extzv_shift_ok, at config/s390/s390.c:2475

2017-01-26 Thread vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240 --- Comment #4 from Dominik Vogt --- > So, either this is a bug in s390_extzv_shift_ok that is should use > s390_contiguous_bitmask_p (contig, true, bitsize, &start, &end); > instead of > s390_contiguous_bitmask_nowrap_p (contig, bitsize, &star

[Bug target/79240] [7 Regression] ICE in s390_extzv_shift_ok, at config/s390/s390.c:2475

2017-01-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, either this is a bug in s390_extzv_shift_ok that is should use s390_contiguous_bitmask_p (contig, true, bitsize, &start, &end); instead of s390_contiguous_bitmask_nowrap_p (contig, bitsize, &start, &end);

[Bug target/79240] [7 Regression] ICE in s390_extzv_shift_ok, at config/s390/s390.c:2475

2017-01-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/79240] [7 Regression] ICE in s390_extzv_shift_ok, at config/s390/s390.c:2475

2017-01-26 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/79240] [7 Regression] ICE in s390_extzv_shift_ok, at config/s390/s390.c:2475

2017-01-26 Thread vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240 --- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt --- Confirmed.

[Bug target/79240] [7 Regression] ICE in s390_extzv_shift_ok, at config/s390/s390.c:2475

2017-01-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |7.0.1 Target Milestone|---