https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80695
--- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Sun Sep 10 21:09:38 2017
New Revision: 251952
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251952&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-09-10 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80695
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Sun Jul 23 15:32:37 2017
New Revision: 250461
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250461&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-07-23 Bill Schmidt
PR target/80695
* config/rs6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80695
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80695
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Thu May 11 20:16:02 2017
New Revision: 247928
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247928&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-05-11 Bill Schmidt
PR target/80695
* con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80695
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80695
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
On x86_64 vectorization is not profitable, likely due to the higher cost of
unaligned vector stores? But yes, I can see that vectorizing it as
_24 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(_2);
_25 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(preph
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80695
--- Comment #1 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note that compiling with -fno-tree-slp-vectorize results in this much better
code:
_IO_new_file_overflow:
ld 9,8(3)
ld 10,64(3)
cmpld 7,9,10
beq 7,.L2
ld
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80695
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wschmidt at gcc dot
gnu.org
Tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80695
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.2 |8.0